魅优论文范文网

 找回密码
 立即注册
查看: 19949|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[论文格式模板] 标准毕业论文格式

[复制链接]

8005

主题

8005

帖子

2万

积分

论坛元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

积分
24099
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2014-4-18 16:07:12 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
毕业论文格式

“封面”样式
                                                 编号         

  

xxxxxx大学



毕   业   论   文



      课题名称                                       





    学生姓名            

    学    号            

  专    业            

  班    级            

  指导教师            



  2004 年    月

“目录”样式
Reflection on Chomsky’s Idealization of Language



I. Introduction

II. Demonstration

A. Language as a concrete system of signs, has its own significance in the context of society.

1. Language is a system.

2.The conventionalization of language.

B. Language as a social institution, is born with society. It develops and interacts  with the society.

1. Communicative function of language.

2. Language evolves hand in hand with the society.

  a.Influences from the society upon language.

  1)   Macrolinguistic perceptive

  2) Microlinguistic perceptive

  b.Influences from language upon society

   1) Interaction between language and society

   2) Social factors and linguistic research

III. Conclusion

“英、中文摘要、关键词”样式

Abstract

This paper begins with a brief introduction to Chomsky’s methodology of idealization in linguistic research. Although the idealization in physical research from which Chomsky’s idealization deprives can still keep natural laws’ validity, the author points out Chomsky’s idealization is not accessible. The key point lies in the exclusion of social factors in his research. Then the author demonstrates the reason why Chomsky’s exclusion of social factors is not accessible from two aspects: (1) Language is a concrete system of signs. (2)Language is a social institution. Only in the context of society are these features significant and integrate, can language bear its form and forward its development and keep up the interaction with the society. Therefore instead of  “being idealized” out of linguistic research, social factors should be regarded as the base of the research. Otherwise the object of the research will be totally changed and the research itself will be misguided. As for what factors can be temporarily idealized without changing language’s fundamental features? This is a question worth our further study in the future.

摘要:本文从Chomsky在语言学研究过程中所采用的理想化模式入手,认为Chomsky为了使研究变得简单,便将与语言关系紧密的社会因素摒除在研究范围之外,这是一种不可取的理想模式。接下来本文从两个主要方面阐述了理想化模式不可取的原因:一是语言作为一种符号系统,只有在社会的环境下才能具有完整的意义。二是语言作为一种社会结构,无论是它的产生还是发展过程,都在不断地和社会发生着相互作用。故而只要是研究语言学,我们就不能将社会因素“理想化”。至于什么因素可以暂时不予考虑,这仍有待进一步的研究。

回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

手机访问本页请
扫描左边二维码
         本网站声明
本网站所有内容为网友上传,若存在版权问题或是相关责任请联系站长!
站长联系QQ:7123767   myubbs.com
         站长微信:7123767
请扫描右边二维码
www.myubbs.com

QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|魅优论文范文网 ( 琼ICP备10200388号-7 )

GMT+8, 2024-5-2 18:36 , Processed in 0.051519 second(s), 20 queries .

Powered by 高考信息网 X3.3

© 2001-2013 大学排名

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表